Financial Statements

Studying a company’s financial statements provides an investor with vital information about a company’s performance and – more importantly – pointers to its prospects.

Analysing that information using financial ratios, such as the oft-quoted price-earnings ratio, allows comparisons to be made with the past, with other companies in the industry, and with the market as a whole.

What are Financial Statements?

Financial statements provide specific information about a company’s financial position and performance. They are found in the annual report and consist of a:

  • Statement of financial performance
  • Statement of financial position
  • Statement of cash flows

Each year, public companies must provide shareholders with an annual report – a document that summarises the results of operations and the company’s financial status in the past year.

Reading the annual report – which must be independently audited – is a chance for investors to examine the company’s financial strength and performance over the past year and to consider what opportunities there are for future growth.

In Australia, the financial year officially runs from July 1 to June 30, but companies may register another 12-month period as their reporting period.

Companies must lodge an annual report with ASIC within four months of the end of their financial year.

That report will be formally presented to shareholders at the annual general meeting (AGM), which must be held within five months of the end of the financial year.

back to top

Reporting Requirements

Six main bodies formulate and/or or enforce accounting regulations in Australia:

  • The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
  • The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB)
  • The Financial Reporting Council (FRC)
  • The Australian Stock Exchange (ASX)
  • The Urgent Issues Group (UIG)
  • The Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF)

Australian companies have four main financial reporting requirements to consider.

First, they must comply with accounting standards. These standards have the aim of ensuring that companies produce financial statements that can be readily compared.

Second, they must provide ‘true and fair’ financial statements. This is commonly interpreted to mean that the financial statements comply with accounting standards.

The company must also provide a directors’ declaration – a signed opinion by company directors attesting that the financial report is true and fair, complies with accounting standards and that the company can meet its debts.

And the annual report must include a report from the company directors providing a general outline of the business for the year and making certain statutory disclosures

Companies will more often than not report their financial results from the perspective of the ‘consolidated’ entity, not just that of the ‘parent’ company.

The objective of consolidated financial reports is to provide a complete picture of the financial performance, position and cash flows of a group of entities that are under common control.

back to top

Accounting standards

On January 1, 2005, Australia completed the phasing out of Australian accounting standards and adopted international financial reporting standards (IFRS).

The new standards resulted in changes in the valuation and recording of items in companies’ financial statements, and in some cases companies had to write off assets from their balance sheets entirely (or more rapidly) under the new rules.

As part of the transition, annual reports issued since the change have included a section detailing the impact of the move to IFRS.

On the plus side, IFRS is expected to improve investors’ ability to compare companies’ financial statements, they are expected to reduce reporting costs for companies – especially those with international operations – and a spin-off is that international capital flow is likely to improve.

Quiz 1

Question 1: The Corporations Law requires that financial statements are ‘true and fair’. What does this mean?
answer
The financial statements and notes must give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the company, registered scheme or disclosing entity as well as the financial position and performance of the consolidated entity (if required).
Question 2: What are some potential benefits of harmonisation of accounting standards?
answer
Increasing the comparability of financial reports prepared in different countries could mean better-quality information to participants in international capital markets. This could remove barriers to international capital flows. Harmonisation could also reduce financial reporting costs for Australian and foreign multinationals.

back to top

Statement of Financial Performance

The statement of financial performance (the profit and loss statement) reports the revenue, expenses and profit (or loss) that have been made over a given period.

The statement shows how an entity’s revenue was obtained and how the expenses were incurred. This report allows investors to evaluate the past performance of an enterprise and assess its prospects for the future.

Here’s an example:

Statement of Financial Performance: ABC Ltd.
for the year ended 30th June 20X5
  $ $
Sales Revenue   100 000
less Cost of Goods Sold   40000
Gross Profit   60 000
less Other Expenses    
Advertising 9 000  
Wages 26 000  
Depreciation Expense 2 000  
Interest on Loans 50 00 42 000
Net Profit   18,000

back to top

 

Statement of Financial Performance

For the year ended 30th June 2005
John Fairfax Holdings Limited and controlled entities
  Note Consolidated
2005
$'000
Consolidated
2004
$'000
Company
2005
$'000
Company
2004
$'000
Revenues from ordinary activities, excluding interest income 2 1,884,368 1,773,368 482,093 155,422
Share of net profits of associates and joint ventures 2 2,907 1,408 - -
Expenses from ordinary activities, excluding depreciation and borrowing costs 3 (1,374,992) (1,341,815) (1,304,705) (93,071)
Profit from ordinary activities before depreciation, interest income, borrowing costs and income tax   512,283 432,961 377,388 62,351
Depreciation and amortisation 3 (82,441) (85,306) (9,991) (7,813)
Profit from ordinary activities before interest income, borrowing costs and income tax   429,842 347,665 367,397 54,538
Interest income 2 7,432 9,598 158,549 158,185
Borrowing costs 3 (85,863) (81,492) (210,694) (158,627)
Profit from ordinary activities before income tax expense   351,411 275,761 315,252 54,096
Income tax benefit/(expense) relating to ordinary activities 5 (91,090) 1,012 (36,495) 25,903
Net profit   260,321 276,773 278,757 79,999
Net profit attributable to outside equity interest 22 (634) (759) - -
Net profit attributable to members of the Company* 21 259,687 276,014 278,757 79,999
Net increase in asset revaluation reserve 20 - 523 - -
Net exchange difference on translation of financial reports pf foreign controlled entities 20 1,076 18,783 - -
Refund of initial transaction costs from issue of shares/(share issue costs) 19 1,117 (1,806) 1,117 (1,806)
Total revenues, expenses and valuation adjustments attributable to members of the Company and recognised directly into equity   2,193 17,500 1,117 (1,806)
Total changes in equity other than those resulting from transactions with owners   261,880 293,514 279,874 78,193
Basic earnings per share (cents) 23 26.24 29.07    
Diluted earnings per share (cents) 23 26.24 28.81    
* Net profit attributable to members of the Company comprises:          
Ongoing operations   252,618 207,644 278,757 79,999
Significant items, net of tax 4 7,069 68,370 - -
    259,687 276,014 278,757 79,999

back to top

The key elements of the statement of financial performance are revenue, expenses and the various measures of profit: gross profit, net profit, EBIT, EBITDA and NOPAT.

Revenue represents cash, or claims to cash, generated through the provision of goods or services.

Expenses are are the costs incurred in the process of earning that revenue – measured by the cost of goods and services consumed in the operation of the business.

Gross profit is is total revenue minus the ‘cost of goods sold’ (COGS). It identifies the amount available to cover other operating expenses.

Net profits is the net increase in the earned resources of the entity.

EBIT (earnings before interest and tax) is a measure of net cash inflow from operating activities – that is, revenue less expenses apart from interest and tax. It is intended to be a more accurate measure of operational profit than if these expenses were included.

EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) is a measure of net cash inflow from operating activities, before working capital movements. Some argue that depreciation and amortisation are inherent expenses to any business and so stripping these out gives a better indication of profit.

NOPAT (net operating profit after tax) measures the amount of profit a company makes after all of its income and expenses. It also represents the total dollar figure that may be distributed to shareholders.

back to top

Extraordinary Items

The statement of financial performance typically identifies the major sources of revenue and expenses as either ‘operating’ or ‘extraordinary’ items.

Extraordinary items are unusual or nonrecurring events that must be explained to shareholders – for example, write-offs of bad debt, adjustments due to revaluation of intangible assets, or the sale of large assets such as buildings.

Extraordinary items are a separate line item on the statement of financial performance and are separately disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.

Be aware of the impact of the way such items are reported. For example, if land is sold and the proceeds included as ‘other income’, on the face of it profit is positively affected. Investors would have to read the notes carefully to understand that this impact on profit is unlikely to recur.

Still, it may be argued that the separate disclosure and discussion of such events reveals much about the performance of the entity that would otherwise not be shown.

Statement of Financial Position

The statement of financial position (balance sheet) is a statement of the book value of a business at a particular point in time.

This statement lists the assets or resources controlled by the enterprise, its debts, and the owner’s claim on the equity.

Here’s a sample statement:

Statement of Financial Performance: ABC Ltd.
as at 30th June 2005
Assets $ Liabilities $  
Cash at Bank 1,000 Accounts Payable 20,000  
Shares in XYZ Ltd. 3,000 Mortgage Loan 33,000 53,000
         
Accounts Receivable 8,000 Shareholders' $  
Inventory 25,000 Capital 61,000  
Furniture and Fittings 30,000 plus Profit 18,000  
Land and Buildings 60,000 less 5,000 74,000
    Retained Profit   13,000
  127,000     127,000

back to top

And here is another example:

Statement of Financial Position

As at 30th June 2005
John Fairfax Holdings Limited and controlled entities
  Note Consolidated
2005
$'000
Consolidated
2004
$'000
Company
2005
$'000
Company
2004
$'000
CURRENT ASSESTS          
Cash assess 33(A) 134,154 28,105 23,813 -
Receivables 7 284,061 270,662 4,525 4,685
Inventories 8 30,195 42,079 - -
Other financial assets 10 411 683 - -
Tax assets 13 - 6,887 - 7,535
Total current assets   448,821 348,416 28,338 12,220
NON-CURRENT ASSETS          
Receivables 7 8,739 3,268 1,387,040 1,227,837
Investments accounted for using the equity method 9 10,661 8,129 - -
Other financial assets 10 13,151 24,538 155,570 155,329
Property, plant and equipment 11 734,345 780,416 50,268 47,999
Intangible assets 12 2,337,142 2,314,919 201 199
Tax assets 13 53,369 51,504 50,064 47,544
Total non-current assets   3,157,407 3,182,774 1,643,143 1,478,908
Total assets   3,606,228 3,531,190 1,671,481 1,491,128
CURRNET LIABLITIES          
Payables 14 204,676 255,017 22,917 23,700
Interest-bearing liabilities 15 163,420 43,289 - 7,503
Provision for income tax 16 25,805 - 25,521 -
Provisions 17 61,004 50,649 5,605 3,633
Total current liabilities   454,605 348,955 54,043 35,836
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES          
Non interest-bearing liabilities 18 867 109 - -
Interest-bearing liabilities 15 902,543 1,074,352 - -
Deferred tab liabilities 16 3,732 1,654 3,732 2,134
Provisions 17 34,999 37,372 30,12 2,652
Total non-current liabilities   942,141 1,113,487 6,744 4,786
Total liabilities   1,397,046 1,462,442 60,787 39,622
Net Assets   2,209,182 2,068,748 1,610,694 1,451,506
EQUITY          
Contributed equity 19 1,425,547 1,357,668 1,425,547 1,357,688
Reserves 20 27,479 26,402 - -
Retained profits 21 752,056 679,817 185,147 93,838
Total parent entity interest in equity   2,205,082 2,063,887 1,610,694 1,451,506
Total outside equity interest 22 4,100 4,681 - -
Total Equity   2,209,182 2,068,748 1,610,694 1,451,506

back to top

The key elements in the statement of financial position are assets, liabilities, net assets, shareholders’ equity, and retained earnings.

Assets are are the economic resources controlled by the entity for the purpose of providing future benefits to that entity. They are divided into two groups: current assets are those intended to be converted into cash or consumed in the next financial year; while non-current assets are those that cannot be easily converted into cash.

Liabilities are the financial obligations of an entity. They are also divided into two groups: current liabilities are those that must be discharged within 12 months; while non-current liabilities are those that will mature beyond the next 12 months, including long-term borrowings, debentures and mortgages.

Net assets are the excess of assets over liabilities.

Shareholders’ equity represents the owners’ interest in the entity or the owners’ claim to the entity.

Retained earnings/profits represent the amount of earnings not distributed to shareholders. This can be regarded as money set aside by the company for future investment.

back to top

Statement of Cash Flows

The statement of cash flows reports the effects of all transactions involving a flow of cash into or out of the entity – whether those transactions are operational, financial or investment in nature.

People who would be interested in the cash flow statement include potential lenders or creditors, who would want a clear picture of a company’s ability to repay, and potential investors, who need to judge whether the company is financially sound.

A statement of cash flows reports movements in cash, over a specified accounting period, under three headings:

Operating activities involve receipts and payments for the production, sale and delivery of goods and services.

Investing activities relate to the acquisition and disposal of non-current assets.

Financing activities relate relate to the size and composition of the financial structure of the entity.

back to top

Here’s a sample statement:

Statement of Cash Flows: ABC Ltd.
for the financial year ended 30th June 2005
  $ $
Cash flows from operating Activities    
Receipts from customers 300,000  
Payments to suppliers -130,000  
Interest Paid -5,000  
Taxes Paid -8,000  
Net Cash provided by operating Activities   157,000
Payment for building -44,000  
Proceeds from Sale of Land 15,000  
Net Cash used by Investing Activities   -29,000
Cash flow from Financing Activities    
Proceeds from Mortgage Issue 5,000  
Proceeds from Share Issue 8,000  
Net Cash used by Financing Activities   -12,000
Net Increase in Cash held   116,000
Cash Balance at the beginning of the year   20,000
Cash Balance a the end of the year   136,000

back to top

And here is another example:

Statement of Cash Flow

As at 30th June 2005
John Fairfax Holdings Limited and controlled entities
  Note Consolidated
2005
$'000
Consolidated
2004
$'000
Company
2005
$'000
Company
2004
$'000
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES          
Receipts from customers   2,068,565 1,926,595 761 -
Payments to suppliers and employees   (1,574,643) (1,551,823) (129,336) (140,778)
Redundancy severance payments   (11,526) (16,925) - -
Dividends and distributions received   2,360 3,544 - -
Interest received   7,432 9,598 17 79
Borrowing costs paid   (85,440) (76,310) (7) (1)
Net income taxes paid   (62,947) (75,978) (1,641) (67)
Net cash provided by(used in) operating activities 33(A) 343,801 218,701 (130,206) (140,767)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES          
Payment for property, plant & equipments   (48,181) (43,660) (14,292) (24,916)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipments   3,167 4,567 - -
Payment for investments   (4,888) (643) - -
Proceeds from sale of investments   95 1,149 - -
Proceeds from the sale of Gordon & Gotch (NZ) Limited   7,699 - - -
Purchase of The Text Media Group Limited (net of cash acquired) 33(C) - (65,456) - (65,456)
Purchase of Port Stephens Publishers Pty Limited
(net of cash acquired)
  (8,675) - - -
Payment for other mastheads and trade names   (9,697) (443) (2) (3)
Loans and deposits repaid   680 328 170 513
Advances from controlled entities   - - 295,215 217,433
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities   (59,800) (104,158) 281,091 127,571
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES          
Proceeds from issue of shares   441 76,253 441 76,253
Refund of transaction costs from issue of shares/(share issue costs)   1,117 (1,806) 1,117 (1,806)
Dividends paid   (121,127) (83,320) (121,127) (83,320)
Costs of private placement of US senior notes & redeemable preference shares   (6,705) - - -
Proceeds from borrowings   182,091 550,166 - -
Repayment of borrowings and other financial liabilities   (233,769) (647,177) - -
Net cash (used in)/provided bifinancing activities   (177,952) (105,884) (119,569) (8,873)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held   106,049 8,659 31,316 (22,069)
Cash/(bank borrowings) at the beginning of the financial year   28,105 19,446 (7,503) 14,566
Cash/(bank borrowings) at the end of the financial year 33(A) 134,154 28,105 23,813 (7,503)

back to top

Quiz 2

Question 1: Which of the following are characteristics inherent to the definition of assets?
  • They possess future economic benefits.
  • The reporting entity must control the future of economic benefits.
  • The transaction or other event giving rise to the control must have occurred.
  • All of the above.
answer
d, All of the above
Question 2: Which of the following are characteristics inherent to the definition of liabilities?
  • There must be a future disposition or sacrifice of benefits to other entities.
  • It must be a present obligation.
  • A past transaction or other event must have created the obligation.
  • All of the above.
answer
d, All of the above

Interpreting Financial Statements

The analysis of financial statements should include all publicly available information, not just the statements themselves. Why? When analysing a company, we need to understand what’s driving the figures that appear on the financial statements.

The analysis needs to be placed in some context: Is the company meeting its corporate goals (which can be found on websites and in annual reports)? And there are broader factors that affect the company under scrutiny: How is the economic environment affecting its results? In a recession you’d expect a food producer to be doing better on the sales front than a maker of plasma television sets …

Accounting treatments are also important when scrutinising financial statements. Turn to the ‘notes’ accompanying the financial statements. Has there been a change in the accounting method used, and, if so, why? If there has, be careful when using figures from the statements in ratio analysis and forecasting (more on this later), as the results will be distorted.

Look beyond the figures. What’s important is where the numbers come from and which way they will head (up or down) in coming quarters and years.

back to top

Ratios

Ratios are an important tool in seeking to understand current performance and form a basis for your forecasting.

There are hundreds of ratios – it’s important to be selective and know specifically what aspects of performance are important to your analysis.

Interpret your calculations. For example, a 15 per cent return on equity (ROE) result is the same as saying that shareholders are receiving a 15 per cent return for every dollar of capital invested; a 10 per cent return on assets (ROA) would be interpreted as a 10 per cent return for every dollar of sales generated.

Look at past ratios for a company as a starting point for forecasting important line items such as sales.

Liquidity Ratios

Liquidity ratios relate to the ability of a firm to service future short-term financial obligations.

Calculation of these ratios matches current assets with current liabilities such as accounts payable and notes payable.

The most basic liquidity ratio is the current ratio, which simply examines the relationship between current assets and current liabilities.

Current Ratio = 
Current Assets
Current Liabilities

A very high current ratio indicates that too many assets are tied up in less than optimal investments (earning lower rates of return), while a low current ratio indicates potential problems in meeting short-term obligations (and a possible need for additional short-term borrowing).

An alternative measure that excludes less liquid assets (such as inventory) is the quick ratio.

Quick Ratio = 
Cash + Marketable Securties + Receivables
Current Liabilities

The most conservative liquidity ratio is the cash ratio as it only considers cash and marketable securities.

Cash Ratio = 
Cash and Marketable Securties
Current Liabilities

The interpretation of both the quick ratio and the cash ratio is similar to the current ratio – too high or too low is not desirable.

A final, commonly used ratio for liquidity is the operating cash flow ratio, which concentrates on a company’s ability to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet current liabilities.

Operating Cash Flow Ratio = 
Current Flow from Operations
Current Liabilities

A higher operating cash flow ratio generally indicates higher management efficiency in the day-to-day operations of a firm.

Quiz 3

Question 1: What does a current ratio of less than one indicate?
answer
A current ratio of less than one indicates negative working capital and the need for short-term borrowing to meet current liabilities.
Question 2: Is a cash ratio equal to one necessarily good?
answer
While a cash ratio of one indicates the firm can meet all current liabilities, it also indicates too many assets are tied up in cash earning (at best) the risk-free rate, rather than being invested in other projects with superior returns.
Question 3: Company ABC had the following quick ratios –2003: 0.49; 2004: 0.52; 2005: 0.36. Is this a positive or negative sign for ABC?
answer
Without knowledge of industry and economy-wide averages, conclusive analysis is not possible. However, a declining quick ratio below 0.5 is generally not a good sign, so management should be questioned as to why the negative trend exists.

back to top

Capital Structure Ratios

Capital structure ratios give some indication of the extent to which a firm relies on debt (and thus equity) to finance its operations.

As a firm increases its debt finance, it increases its financial risk, together with the probability of default and bankruptcy.

The debt-to-equity ratio measures the proportion of capital raised from debt compared to other sources such as common stock.

Debt/Equity Ratio = 
Total Long-Term Debt
Total Equity

The debt-to-equity ratio is generally compared over time to gauge how a company’s reliance on debt varies. An increase in debt is often considered undesirable.

For businesses that derive a significant amount of capital from short-term borrowing, the total debt ratio is often more appropriate.

Total Debt Ratio = 
Total Debt
Total Equity

The total debt ratio is interpreted in a similar way to the debt-to-equity ratio, except that a much lower ratio is expected (about 50 per cent lower than the debt-to-equity ratio).

Then there’s the interest coverage ratio. In addition to understanding the proportion of debt on the statement of financial performance, this ratio relates the flow of earnings available to meet interest obligations.

Interest Coverage Ratio = 
Net Income + Income Taxes + Interest Expenses
Interest Expenses

The interest coverage ratio indicates how many times interest expenses are covered by normal earnings.

back to top

Quiz 4

Question 1: ABC company has had the following debt-to-equity ratios over the past three years – 2003: 208 per cent; 2004: 196 per cent; 2005: 165 per cent. What could the trend in the ratios indicate?
answer
ABC’s reliance on debt is gradually decreasing over the years. This could be a result of a decline in the need for additional capital or an increase in the use of equity funding.
Question 2: WWhat do the following interest coverage ratios tell us about MMM company? 2003: 8.44 times; 2004: 5.94 times; 2005: 3.27 times.
answer
Although all ratios are above 3 which is a positive aspect, theratio has declined by over 50 per cent in the past three years. Should interest rates risein the near future, MMM could struggle to continually support their fixed interest obligations. To prevent future financial difficulty, MMM could consider reducing their relianceon debt.

Profitability Ratios

Profitability ratios allow an evaluation of how profitable a company’s operations were (profit margins), and how effectively it used its assets (capital).

The gross profit margin (where gross profit equals net sales less COGS) indicates the basic cost structure of the firm.

Gross Profit Ratio = 
Gross Profit
Net Sales

The gross profit margin is best compared over time –a falling margin generally indicates that selling prices are not keeping track with operating expenses.

The operating profit margin (where operating profit equals gross profit less selling, general and administrative expenses) is a prime indicator of business risk.

Operating Profit Margin = 
Operating Profit
Net Sales

As the operating profit margin reflects all operating policies (while eliminating debt policy), a falling margin generally indicates an increase in business risk.

Net profit margin simply relates net income to sales.

Net Profit Margin = 
Net Profit
Net Sales

The net profit margin should be based on earnings from continuing operations to give some indication of future profitability.

Finally, the return on total capital ratio measures how effective the firm was in using resources.

Return on Capital = 
Net Income + Interest Expense
Average Total Capital

As the return on total capital ratio is effectively the company’s return on all capital employed, it should be compared to that of other companies and the economy as a whole.

If the ratio is less than expected, given the risk of the firm, the question arises whether the business should exist at all or the capital be invested in other, more productive projects.

back to top

Quiz 5

Question 1: XYZ company has the following gross profit margins – 2003: 49.9 per cent; 2004: 50.8 per cent; 2005: 46.8 per cent. Describe the trend and a possible cause.
answer
The year 2005 has seen a definite decline in the gross profit margin. This could be caused by an increase in selling expenses without appropriate increases in selling prices.
Question 2: Analyse the following operating profit margins for JFK company – 2003: 9.7 per cent; 2004: 10.1 per cent; 2005: 6 per cent (compared with industry averages of – 2003: 14.5 per cent; 2004: 12.6 per cent; 2005: 12.7 per cent).
answer
JFK has experienced a definite decline in its operating profit margin in 2005, which is concerning. Whilst industry averages have also been falling over the same period, JFK’sratios are consistently below industry averages, potentially indicating that JFK is riskier than other businesses in the industry.
Question 3: JFK also has the following return on total capital – 2004: 14.9 per cent; 2005: 8.1 per cent. If industry (economy-wide) averages are 10.1 per cent (9.7 per cent) in 2004 and 7.7 per cent (6.9 per cent) in 2005, what can you say about the performance of JFK?
answer
Although JFK has experienced a significant drop in returns in 2005, in both 2004 and 2005, JFK outperformed both industry and economy wide averages. This is commensurate with the operating profit margin results which suggest above average business risk for JFK.

Turnover Ratios

Turnover ratios give some indication of how well management is using assets and capital (in terms of dollar sales) in running the business.

The total asset turnover ratio indicates how effectively the firm is using its total asset base.

Total Asset Turnover Ratio = 
Net Sales
Average Total Assets

As there is significant variation across industries, the total asset turnover ratio should be compared across companies within an industry sector. A very high (greater than 10) or low (less than 1) result is undesirable.

The equity turnover ratio indicates how effective the firm was in using its alternative capital.

Equity Turnover Ratio = 
Net Sales
Average Equity

The equity turnover ratio needs to be interpreted in conjunction with capital structure ratios, as an increase in debt capital will lead to an increase in this ratio.

In addition to measuring how effective management is in using resources, it’s important to know how efficient management is in turning inventory into profit.

The average inventory processing period is a measure of processing time.

Average Inventory Porocessing Period = 
365
Inventory Turnover

A lower inventory processing period indicates that inventory is being turned over more frequently, but it is essential that this ratio is compared to industry averages.

back to top

Quiz 6

Question 1: Comment on the following total asset turnover ratios for ABC Ltd – 2003: 1.83; 2004: 1.96; 2005: 2.03 (industry averages over the same period are – 2003: 1.48; 2004: 1.49; 2005: 1.39).
answer
An increasing asset turnover ratio indicates that ABC’s management is becoming more efficient in using their entire asset base. This is especially encouraging as industry averages are below ABC’s ratios (and are also falling).
Question 2: The average inventory processing period for XYZ is as follows – 2004: 46.4 days; 2005: 42.1 days. Comment on these figures, given the following industry averages – 2004: 37.3 days; 2005: 37.5 days.
answer
There are two main points to note here. The first is a decline in the average processing period for XYZ, which is a positive sign. However, given that XYZ was approximately 10 days above average in 2004, the decline in processing period was essential, with further reductions still necessary to reach industry average.

Cash Flow Ratios

In addition to using information from the statement of financial performance, it’s common to calculate a series of ratios based on a business’s cash flows.

A company’s cash flow is often compared to its financial obligations, with the view of predicting future financial difficulty.

The cash flow to interest expense ratio simply relates the company’s cash flow to interest repayment obligations.

Cash Flow/Interest Expense = 
Net Income + Depreciation + Deferred Taxes
Interest Expense

The cash flow/interest expense ratio gives an indication of how many times the cash flow generated from operations is able to cover the interest expense. A declining ratio could indicate impending financial difficulty.

The cash flow coverage ratio is similar to the above ratio except that interest payments are added back to the cash flow. The ratio is interpreted in a similar fashion.

Cash Flow Coverage Ratio = 
Net Income + Depreciation + Deferred Taxes + Interest Expense
Interest Expense

Finally, the cash flow to long-term debt ratio relates cash flow to outstanding debt. It is generally considered one of the best predictors of future bankruptcy.

Cash Flow/Long-Term Debt = 
Net Income + Depreciation + Deferred Taxes
Book - Value of Long-Term Debt

A falling cash flow/long-term debt ratio – especially if below industry averages – is a sign of potential financial difficulty.

back to top

Quiz 7

Question 1: What do the following cash flow to interest expense ratios indicate about MMM company – 2003: 6.3 times; 2004: 5.1 times; 2005: 3.39 times (with industry averages – 2003: 6.1 times; 2004: 5.9 times; 2005: 5.8 times).
answer
While in 2003 and 2004 MMM’s ratios compared well to industry averages, 2005 has seen a significant decline for MMM. This could indicate that MMM’s cash flow may not be sufficient to cover all future interest repayments.
Question 2: ABC has the following cash flow to long-term debt ratios – 2004: 34.6 per cent; 2005: 29.8 per cent. Industry averages over the same period are as follows – 2004: 36.2 per cent; 2005: 39.8 per cent. What does this indicate about the long-term prospects of ABC?
answer
A falling cash flow to long term debt ratio is generally a very negative sign for a company. As ABC’s ratio was below industry average in 2004, and fell considerably in 2005 (while industry average increased), financial difficulty may be imminent. ABC’s management should immediately review both their cash flows and use of debt finance to alleviate the possibility of financial distress.

Owners’ Equity Ratios

Owners’ equity ratios are very important to the real owners (the common shareholders) of the company.

These ratios indicate the rate of return that management has earned on capital supplied by the owners, after incorporating all payments to other sources of capital (that is, interest repayments).

The return on total equity ratio includes all equity in the company (common stock plus preferred stock).

Return on Total Equity = 
Net Income
Average Total Equity

The return on owner’s equity ratio is based on common shareholders’ equity only.

Return on Owner's Equity = 
Net Income - Preferred Dividend
Average Common Equity

Both the return on total equity and return on owners’ equity ratios should be in line with the risk of the business. They should also be compared to industry and economy-wide averages to determine how successful management has been in running the firm.

As the return on owners’ equity (ROE) is one of the most important performance indicators, it is commonly broken down into several components.

ROE = 
Net Income
Net Sales
 x 
Sales
Total Assets
 x 
Total Assets
Common Equity

The above breakdown effectively consists of three separate ratios:

  • profit margin
  • total asset turnover
  • financial leverage

While analysis of the overall ROE figure is important, the break-down allows a more thorough analysis of how changes in ROE are attributable to profit margins, asset turnover and changes in capital structure.

back to top

Quiz 8

Question 1: Analyse the following ROE breakdown figures for ABC over the past two years.
Year Profit Margin Total Asset Turnover Financial Leverage ROE Industry Average ROE
2004 1.83 3.61 4.44 29.35 24.56
2004 2.04 5.11 5.36 55.88 32.48
2005 2.04 5.11 5.36 55.88 32.48

answer

The first step is to analysethe overall ROE figure. For ABC, there has been a large increase (approximately 50 per cent) in 2005. While industry averages also increased, the change for ABC is well above average, indicating above average performance.

The second step is to analyseeach of the three components. While each component has increased for ABC, the greatest change occurred in the total asset turnover ratio. Management is becoming more efficient in using its total asset base to generate income. The increase in net profit margin is also a very positive sign for ABC’s management.

back to top

Industry Benchmarking

While it’s necessary to look at ratios for a company both as stand-alone figures and across time, it’s also essential that ratios are compared with those of other companies.

The problem with straight comparisons across companies is that different industry sectors have very different patterns of liquidity, cash flow, capital structure and profitability, and these vary systematically – and quite often predictably – over time.

These systematic variations across industries generally can be attributed to five main forces:

• Rivalry among existing companies

  • Threat of new entrants
  • Threat of substitute products
  • Bargaining power of buyers
  • Bargaining power of suppliers

As each of these forces varies over time, the expected profitability of each industry sector will also vary – hence the need for industry benchmarking.

When completing an analysis of the financial statements of a company, it’s essential that appropriate industry averages are available for comparison.

The comparisons need to account for current-year standings (for example, is this year’s ratio significantly different to the industry average for the year?), as well as how the industry has changed over time (has a particular ratio increased or decreased over the past three to five years for both the company and the industry?).

It’s important to note that even within the same industry, companies can vary significantly in terms of strategy and future growth opportunities. And quite often the operations of one company can fall into various industry classifications, making single-industry analysis difficult.

When situations like this arise it’s important to select companies that share the most similar operating and financial characteristics and calculate ‘industry’ averages using just these companies.

RTC model

The US appears to be putting its houses - Fannie and Freddie - in order, writes Glenn Mumford.