Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
Advertisement

Opinion

Helen Irving

Senate a sticking point for four-year terms

The conundrum that must be squarely faced is 1988’s defeated take-it-or-leave-it constitutional amendment that rolled in a shorter term for the upper house.

Helen IrvingProfessor Emerita

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

When the framers of Australia’s Constitution, meeting at the federal convention of 1897-98, committed to a three-year term for the House of Representatives, they followed the constitutional procedure of the majority of Australia’s colonies. They briefly considered a four-year term.

John Forrest, premier of Western Australia (which alone had four-year parliamentary terms), suggested that three years gave insufficient time for MPs to visit their electorates and travel long distances for sittings of the future federal parliament. But this argument was met with the proposition that four years would give MPs too much time for their actions to go without scrutiny.

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Federal

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Politics